A Common Sense Argument for Sustainable Farming

/http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/08/sustainable-farming/

“Fun/depressing fact: It takes the earth 18 months to replenish the amount of resources we use each year. Looked at another way, we’d need 1.5 earths to be sustainable at our current rate of consumption.”

In Mark Bittman’s editorial for The New York Times, Sustainable Farming Can Feed the World?, the above quote really grabbed my attention – just what a good, compelling editorial should do. Why did this quote catch my eye and draw me in? Because it is fact-based, it underscores the topic the author is taking on, and it provides the reader with a reason to care about and listen to the writer’s opinion.

This editorial explores the possible benefits of a conversion from industrial farming to sustainable farming by way of a solutions-based rational. The author’s citing of many global problems that could be alleviated through sustainable farming methods balances out the article; from hunger and obesity to depletion of natural resources and global warming, Mr. Bittman rounds out his argument rather than pushing one particular agenda. Compromise is a present theme, with the author interjecting ideas some adherents are willing to consider but that staunch supporters of the sustainable farming model might rule out, such as the possible need for the continued use of chemical fertilizers in order to meet short-term goals while making the shift towards long-term solutions.

The editorial compels the reader to acknowledge the injustices of a world in which millions live in hunger while fifty percent of food produced is thrown away and millions struggle with the complications of obesity. Knowing that geographic separation from such ethical dilemmas can ease the American conscience, Bittman further emphasizes the threat to our own existence if we continue on. The continued use of resource-guzzling, environmentally destructive industrial farming just won’t cut it; we don’t have 1.5 earths.

Overall, I particularly like the author’s placement of relevant, easy to access links, containing factual information to back up the opinions expressed. Bittman’s basic logic is compelling while uncomplicated, leaving me with food for thought (couldn’t resist!)